Neither has a wireguard tunnel into your home network, you host the WG server on your own computer (or router even, that’s what I do) and just point your clients to that using either static IP if you have it or a DDNS service like the cloudflare you’re using if you have a dynamic IP.
You spin up a Wireguard server yourself (or use the one in many routers), point clients to that and be happy. The only “other” server in that chain might be a (Dyn)DNS resolver, and you could even self-host that one (and therefore also omit Cloudflare).
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
Neither has a wireguard tunnel into your home network, you host the WG server on your own computer (or router even, that’s what I do) and just point your clients to that using either static IP if you have it or a DDNS service like the cloudflare you’re using if you have a dynamic IP.
altphoto@lemmy.today 19 hours ago
WireGuard still needs a central server that you don’t control.
Anyway, this thing is just impressive that’s all.
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
No, it really doesn’t
goldman60@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
This is flatly incorrect
Lolwhat, no it doesn’t…? Did an AI tell you that?
You spin up a Wireguard server yourself (or use the one in many routers), point clients to that and be happy. The only “other” server in that chain might be a (Dyn)DNS resolver, and you could even self-host that one (and therefore also omit Cloudflare).
altphoto@lemmy.today 18 hours ago
Oh so it doesn’t do dynamic changes in IP like rayfish does within a few seconds?