Why wouldn’t they pass that in California? California loves monitoring people. Right now it’s mostly with cars (license plate readers, and now digital license plates with tracking built-in). Screw California, they don’t care about privacy at all.
Comment on How the American war on porn could change the way you use the internet
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
laughs in california
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 months ago
Smells like a slippery slope fallacy to me
nomous@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yours sounds like a fallacy fallacy. Pointing out a logical error doesn’t mean the conclusion is inherently wrong.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
No, it’s a slippery slope argument. It’s a fallacy if and only if the claim in unlikely to follow from the initial argument.
I’m demonstrating two examples of privacy-violating policy from California, where the excuse is to help in policing. If they can tie in policing to porn/social media, I think they’ll do it. So yes, it’s a slippery slope argument, but I don’t think it’s a fallacy.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Hahaha… why?
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 months ago
first, I think it is easily challenged on first amendment grounds
second, I’m not an idiot and I know how to pirate shit
third, if things continue to accelerate towards disaster I believe CA is the least shitty place to enjoy a normal life (that happens to include porn, for me)
wrekone@lemmyf.uk 5 months ago
Oregon joins the chat…
barsquid@lemmy.world 5 months ago
They would. “States’ rights” is bullshit that they start with only when they fail to regulate at the national level. Every time.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Yeah, we have to stop it! Literally pussy, tits and cocks power the Internet use. I wouldn’t use it if it was just reading shit.