Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
Comment on FCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loophole
xenspidey@lemmy.zip 6 months agoThe things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 months ago
xenspidey@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
This is totally missing the point. What happened is the equivalent of the bus company calling the supermarket and saying “hey, I’ve noticed a lot of people going to your store. If you want to keep that, you’ve got to pay extra so I don’t drop half the busses from your route”
BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
They do.
Do you think Netflix connects to the internet for free?
AstralPath@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
I’m enjoying watching you dig this massive pit for yourself. Lol
Kraiden@kbin.run 6 months ago
Net neutrality is the status quo, it's not trying to "solve" anything
xenspidey@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
Kraiden@kbin.run 6 months ago
To. Protect. It.
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.
It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes