About what I was expecting.
Kinda hoping for it to reach the debate milestone, but its growth seems to have slowed. Still plenty of time for that to change though. It’s still in the first month I believe.
Saff@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
Classic petition response. “We will do nothing extra here, there are already rules in place even if they are shitty ones you don’t like, suck it up.”
s12@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
echodot@feddit.uk 6 months ago
You are probably better off for asking that same question in 6 months, maybe less.
s12@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
I guess the petition committee only has the significant power to request information for their response.
Tweak@feddit.uk 6 months ago
The petition isn’t over with this response, it’ll run for 6 months and if it breaks 100,000 signatures it is required to be debated in Parliament.
VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 6 months ago
This is why I never saw the point in the UK petition. Fuck all chance the tories would give a fuck and it was a waste of time signing it. I very much doubt there’s even 100 mps from all parties that have any real understanding of video games or give a fuck about them.
s12@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
Kinda why I still think it would have been a good idea for it to refer to software in general.
echodot@feddit.uk 6 months ago
The campaign should have very much steered away from using the word video game at all. It allows them to dismiss the entire ideas oh look at them nerds. If they’d said software, and emphasized the corporate angle, we may have got a better response.
s12@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
Perhaps an advantage could be that people could try again using “software” and making some other tweaks. I think you’re only supposed to make a petition for one subject once.
If there is a second attempt using “software” then you can campaign to the older people who may then better understand, as well as the people who are already interested in games.
Making it about software might then make the idea of public demonstrations seem less silly.
Not too sure though.