Comment

Comment on We can do all three things at once

The waste doesn’t pose any danger as long as it’s stored securely and doesn’t cost that much space. The only downside of the waste is that it needs to be stored forever, but that’s a very, very, small price to pay for not destroying the planet…

source

Sort:hotnew top

Sniatch@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
But its also possible without nuclear waste. You are just pushing the problems with the waste to the future generations.

source
- atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  There needs to be a future generation to push it onto first...
  
  source
  - Sniatch@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems.
    
    source
    Forester@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    You and your fearmongering is the problem
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Star@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Nuclear fuel came from the ground, it can go back in the ground. Future generations aren’t going to be impacted by nuclear waste storage.
  
  source
- Duamerthrax@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  No one who makes decisions so far has cared about future generations.
  
  source
  - Sniatch@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water cooking maschine
    
    source
    zalgotext@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Nearly every power plant ever, including green ones, is an overly expensive water boiling machine
    
    source
    Duamerthrax@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    I’m actually pushing for degrowth. It’s the simplest path to ending oil use
    
    source
- Cryophilia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  What problem? If they’re stupid enough to dig it back up, they get what’s coming to em
  
  source