What I don’t understand is why does competition matter for workers but somehow not for CEOs? I kind of understand and agree in the free market to an extent - if you’re fine with hiring a dev for $100 instead of another dev for $1000, and you’re okay with the difference in quality / time / etc. then go for it. But where is all this competition happening for CEOs?
Surely someone must be as qualified as Bitchai and willing to do the same job for a measly 100 million a year instead of his 200 million.
gian@lemmy.grys.it 6 months ago
Assuming the same job’s quality, a possible answer is “because to live where your company is you need to be paid $200K/year”
01011@monero.town 6 months ago
That presumes that they are invested in your survival…
john89@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
How do people live in these areas without making $200k/year?
gian@lemmy.grys.it 6 months ago
They cannot, that is the reason you need to pay that much to work for you.
john89@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
So nobody lives in these areas that makes under $200k/year?
Even the janitors?