Comment on But how would they be able to live on that?
dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 months agoYou’re mostly right here, except stocks are an asset you can take a loan against with a margin loan or a line of credit. I suggest if you are doing that it SHOULD count as realized gains because you absolutely can use such a loan to buy a house, a car, a yacht, an island in the South Pacific, or an aircraft carrier.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Okay but if you take out a loan then you need to repay the loan with income which is taxed, so…
It’s already being taxed…
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You can repay a loan with money from a different loan. And they only just need enough money to cover the interest. For most of them the repayment doesn’t come until they die and even then they pull as many tricks as possible to make it look like their estate is worth less than it is. Either way the amount of money these guys live off of is a tiny percentage of their entire wealth. 100M loan for a new mansion? That’s not even 0.05% of Elon’s wealth. Even $1 billion is a lot of fucking money. I don’t care how illiquid your wealth is, if it’s over $10B you’re just hoarding it and it’s doing fuck all for the economy.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That wealth is primarily invested in businesses that function within the economy, so “doing fuck all for the economy” is literally a lie, and this act is literally the opposite of “hoarding”.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
You, uh, don’t think maybe more of those unrealized gains should go to the actual workers? What the fuck?
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The business can survive just fine having more owners, each with a smaller piece of the pie. Yes, you lose majority control but boo hoo on still being filthy rich.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Okay but that doesn’t justify taxing all unrealized gains for everyone, does it? Just tax the rich, or add laws against perpetual refinance without income.
Sidenote: If Elon Musk could do such a convoluted scheme then he wouldn’t have sold Billions of Tesla stock a couple of years ago and paid Capital Gains taxes in the billions. I believe with all my heart that Elon is such a POS that he would have absolutely wormed his way out of that sort of requirement if it were so easy.
ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Listen, Jim - how much do you realistically own in unrealized gains? It doesn’t even matter to be honest - since you’re shit posting on the Internet, I wouldn’t put your net worth much higher than $10-20 million - and that’s me being an absolute philanthropist, in terms of how much “benefit of the doubt” I’m willing to afford an Internet shit poster.
Even if you were somehow blessed to have more than that - you still wouldn’t qualify as one who needs to pay this kind of wealth tax.
Where’d you get the idea that it would “tax all unrealized gains”?
dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 months ago
Yeah it’s taxed at a much lower rate. Short term capital gains is a real bitch. Long term isn’t so bad unless you’re liquidating a lot… Like enough to buy a house or car or something we are discussing now. Over 450k ish is taxed 20%, but you can get a loan for 3 to 12 percent AND it’s tax deductible lol.
Really, if you aren’t rich with stock you are getting F-ed in the A…
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Sorry I misread your comment before I responded.
dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 months ago
NBD, I saw this first actually.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
If a hypothetical unrealized gains taxed passed today then there is a chance of poor people getting F-ed in the A, especially people with retirement funds or VYM shares. There is even a chance it hurts the poorer 80% more than the richer 20%.
The 2016 Tax Reform is a great example of that, it got tons of support from poor people and middle class and in the end it fucked them all in the A.
jj4211@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Depends on the structure. If it’s 3% on value over 5 million, then the bottom 95% will not even have a dent. If it is paid by even average retirement funds, but funds more expensive Medicaid or your kids college education, you still win. It all depends on the details.
I suppose there might be some sell off to cover the tax bills if the wealthy, but it probably wouldn’t shake the markets too much.
jj4211@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Part of the problem is there are shell games around the repayment. I thought this could be handled by any use of the stock as collateral should count as a ‘sale’ for tax purposes, and any taxes on those proceeds that would be “double taxed” as folks are so afraid of can be offset by tax credits if the loan is ‘properly’ repaid in a normal way. So if you loan but repay normally, ok, you gave the government a ‘0% loan’, but you are still “fairly” taxed other than that, and the 0% loan is a small price to pay for access to your wealth.