Comment on Face masks made ‘little to no difference’ in preventing spread of COVID: study
Ginger666@lemmy.world 7 months ago
WHERE IS THE FUCKING STUDY
holy shit i hate the “news”
Comment on Face masks made ‘little to no difference’ in preventing spread of COVID: study
Ginger666@lemmy.world 7 months ago
WHERE IS THE FUCKING STUDY
holy shit i hate the “news”
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
It’s mostly just for discussion, most people know the masks were just “security theater” and weren’t really that helpful or necessary, and that if there were real problems much more dramatic measures would have been needed to have been taken
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Oh, it’s you again, from the Rowling post. Trying to spark discussion based on shit articles and false premise (“most people know the masks were just “security theater”…”).
rdyoung@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Just block and move on.
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
or we can just talk about it. actual discussions occur some places. sometimes people are able to work things out and come to agreements.
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
well I mean most people are not masking right now. i do see some people out there with masks though. I think probably most wouldn’t have masked unless it was mandated, and it seems like it shouldn’t have bene
Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Would you rather me wear a mask, or not wear a mask while I spit in your face? If you’d rather me wear a mask, why?
airrow@hilariouschaos.com 7 months ago
Ok, so are you making the point that when people talk, they can spit everywhere, so obviously then masks would reduce this? Off topic but this is kind of funny, I was already thinking about masking around car and industrial fumes when in cities before “covid”… unfortunately I feel masks wrongly became politicized (not by our side) and instead of just recommend them and allow people to make adult decisions about them, they were tyrannically imposed upon people, confusing people if they were beneficial or not. But anyway, I think I might frame it in a different way: say I have a super infectious disease, like the plague. Would you feel comfortable simply being around someone with plague with a mask on? Wouldn’t quarantine be much safer? So why not just have us advocate for this much safer option of keeping people instead of 6 feet apart, 600 feet apart (lol)?
Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Unfortunately an N95 mask wouldn’t be effective for fumes, you would need a vapor mask for that. N95 and similar masks are particulate masks, they filter particles out of the air before it reaches your lungs. Yes, people produce aerosoled particulate when they breathe and talk. The viruses are very small and travel on our breath which can be inhaled by others. Watch someone vaping for example, or smoking. That’s how much air people are circulating through their lungs when they breathe, you just can’t see it.
Of course I’d rather not be exposed to you if you have the plague, but if I had to be around you, I’d want both of us wearing the best masks on the market. Complete isolation would have been great, and it would have stopped the pandemic from developing. Unfortunately that’s not realistic for the majority of people. Even if you stayed at home and ordered your groceries to be delivered, someone still has to go to a warehouse, get their truck, go to the grocery store, buy your food, and bring it to you. They’re going to be exposed to other people who also have to do things along the way. A mask provides an additional layer of security.
You saw yourself why voluntary mask usage isn’t adequate. Some people will never do anything they’re told to do. Some people are malicious. Some politicians wanted to make a health crisis into a political demonstration. There’s a bunch of reasons why it required guidelines. People shouldn’t need to be forced to do a lot of things that are for their good and the good of society, but unfortunately that’s not the reality we live in.