Comment on i tend to agree

• Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I just have regular sexuality, where I’m attracted to what I’m attracted to

  source

  • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club

    source
  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Despite having “sexual” as its root, sapiosexuality is an attraction-defining term, not to be confused with a definition of sexuality. Like other attraction-defining terms, it’s not exclusive.

    source

    • Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I just hate labels. I like what I like. Not just smart people. Not just pretty people. Not even people with specific genitals.

      source

      • flicker@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ah. Chaotic horny.

        Just like me.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Not just smart people. Not just pretty people.

        …but also pretty smart people?

        source
    • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Why does this comment start with “despite”? Aren’t all [something]sexualities “attraction-defining terms”?

      source

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Traditionally speaking, the terms heterosexual and homosexual tend to be exclusive by omitting attraction to the opposite sex. I was clarifying that a sapiosexual is not exclusively attracted to intellectuals.

        *Now that sexuality is defined as a non-binary spectrum, some may disagree with my use of “opposite sex.” I admit I don’t know the correct way to convey the idea. I don’t mean to offend.

        source
  • match@pawb.social ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    oh yeah, I’m also attracted to what you’re attracted to

    source
• exocrinous@startrek.website ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Attraction to intelligence is sapiophilia. Attraction to smartgender people is sapiosexuality

  source