I found a related thread to this on Hacker News. It was interesting to read: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19365968
poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
For all practical purposes Matrix is run by a private for profit and venture-capital funded company called Element / New Vector.
jg1i@lemmy.world 10 months ago
poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
It has improved a bit since then (2019), but mainly because of the detoriating funding situation forcing Element to push the Matrix foundation to try and survive on their own.
Carighan@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Wow that guy sounds like an asshole. No wonder they banned him.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
The Element server is so much more stable than synapse
Link@rentadrunk.org 10 months ago
What element server?
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 months ago
Not sure if it’s truly independent, or just a management panel over synapse.
justJanne@startrek.website 10 months ago
ESS is a product built on top of synapse with custom additions, but it’s still synapse underneath.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 10 months ago
If the company went under you could continue to selfhost, right?
poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
Yes, but there are IMHO better options like XMPP or IRC that are truely community driven and have stood the test of time.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
I think if anything they have lost to the test of time
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 10 months ago
I would argue that IRC hasn’t managed to evolve with the needs and wants of modernity and that’s why the likes of Discord and Matrix have become so big.
Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 10 months ago
IRCv3 the “next gen” version of IRC is woefully inadequate compared to Matrix. The IRC working group is only worried about the IRC client protocol and the effort seems to have largely stalled. That’s like defining the protocol for Lemmy servers and clients without the Lemmy server to server communication.
ircv3.net/wg
XMPP is a potentially more compelling option/a good option. I don’t know enough about the low level details to really debate whether XMPP is “better or worse.”
I don’t think either of these protocols being older qualifies them for superiority on the merits of “standing the test of time.”
Carighan@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s a natural result of this “design by comittee” approach. In the effort to please everyone, you end up pleasing no one.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Oh okay, good good. I apologize for my mistake in the title.