Understandable, however, generalities sometimes aren't enough in a court of law.
The difference between the spirit and letter of the law allows for interpretations that don't agree with each other. As we can see in this situation.
And like it or not, this is a social court of law. Moderators and admins are judges who follow the rules and administer relative justice. You can either agree to give them the latitude to have their own interpretation of the rules as long as they stick to them, or you make concise rules that offer no room for discussion.
You might say each instance can have its own rules and that is true, but when those written rules are the same and defederation starts to happen because there is disagreement on the meaning of those words, the "in general" part is going to be the mainstay of how rules are enforced.
And, in general, that's part of what causes societies to fall.
AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 months ago
Hate to Godwin this thread, but does that mean you can't attack Nazis as a group on lemmy.ml?
Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Of course not. They apply their rules subjectively.
For instance I got rule 1’d for saying “Fuck China” but I bet you, you wouldn’t get banned for saying “Fuck America” or “Fuck Israel” (fuck ‘em all imo).
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I got rule 2 for sharing a yassified Patrick because I, a huge homo, may find discomfort in what gay memes I share, I guess!
Lath@kbin.earth 3 months ago
If you have evidence of abuse and selective enforcement of the rules, show it in order to allow the admins to act on it.
Don't just lash out, document the exchange. Keep a record of the favouritism.
Lath@kbin.earth 3 months ago
You can try, within your interpretation of their rules. And if you get banned for that, take pictures.