Comment on Proton Pass breaks prowlarr on firefox since today

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Alk@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  By your metrics, possiblylinix127, Linux is also a system that is used for piracy. I can do piracy on Linux. That makes it illegal!

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What are you using *arr for that isn’t piracy?

    source

    • Alk@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Managing my blu ray library. Among other things. What are you using Linux for that isn’t piracy?

      source
    • peasntanks@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Managing a legally procured library of media. Piracy is not the only way to get digital music, movies, and books.

      source

      • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I just know that the Powlarr site does not instill conference

        source
    • dan@upvote.au ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I actually use Lidarr for managing CDs I’ve ripped myself. It helped me convert a mess of files with nonsensical names into a nice clean directory structure, plus I can track which albums I’ve got vs which ones I’m missing.

      source
• Confused_Emus@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Oh, piss off.

  source
• wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  How to display the fact that you didn’t do any double-checking before posting 101. It takes 5 seconds to do a search query, cmon.

  Also thinking ‘all VPN services are for piracy’ is like thinking ‘all guns are for criminals’. Incredibly, incredibly short-sighted.

  source
• rambos@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Piracy tools are more reliable than payed services lol

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Except you are creating legal risk

    source

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Nope, there is no legal risk to a password manager because someone used it to fill a password in on a program for piracy.

      source
• melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why would a random browser extension take it upon itself to snoop on your traffic to ensure that the websites you’re using can’t be used for illegal things, and then intentionally break it if it detects something it thinks it’s illegitimate? That’s a huge overreach. There’s no “legal reasons” that would justify a breach of privacy like that. It’s just malware at that point.

  No, I think this is just a bug. Especially since people have reported that the extension breaks other websites too.

  source
• jjlinux@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Just WAO!

  source