Comment on Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification
whatisallthis@lemm.ee 1 year agoWouldn’t it be sick if once your company got up to a net worth of ONE TRILLION DOLLARS you’d just stop trying to shoehorn in new ways to make profit?
Rusky_900@reddthat.com 1 year ago
It’s comically perverted and epicly sad that leaders with power in society don’t stop this kind of thing.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
I’ve been questioning whether the current implementation of democracy can work in a modern world, where corporate entities can grow beyond the size of government.
As long as the people is represented by a smaller subset of the people, corporations wont need to please the people. Only the representatives. The same way that in the US, the electoral college means your vote technically doesn’t have direct power, there’s a disconnect between people voting for not getting screwed, and that sentiment actually becoming law.
ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sounds like taxation without representation to me.
YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Wasn’t there a proposal to let companies vote in Delaware not too long ago? Democracy would truly only apply for the rich at that point
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 year ago
I’m always disappointed that this kind of stuff gets no interest from the mainstream media. Nearly everyone in developed countries interacts with the internet and thus they should all care