“cloud” has nothing to do with this. Plenty of people use wireless cameras for local/selfhost setups because it is easier for them to run power than data/ethernet.
And there are actually very good arguments for wired “cloud” cameras. Because if you still have an internet connection (cable drop to the street), then your footage and alert are now offsite rather than on a hard drive in the house that is being “attacked”.
lauha@lemmy.one 1 year ago
The cloud is not the problem. Inadequate local buffer is the problem.
Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If it’s got local storage, it’s not ‘cloud based’.
I’m not saying offsite backups of your local storage are a bad idea.
lauha@lemmy.one 1 year ago
I didn’t say storage. I called it a buffer. No permanent local storage needed
Venator@lemmy.nz 1 year ago
Wifi jammers could knock it out before the camera sees anything.
LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The jammers don’t disable the cameras, they just prevent them from streaming the captured video to the recording machine.
If the cameras had a local buffer, they’d be able to keep recording even if the signal was jammed.
ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Until the cameras are destroyed, which is easier to do when they’re not streaming in real time
lauha@lemmy.one 1 year ago
You cannot block a camera from seeing by jamming the wifi. It could simply save the video feed locally and send it to the server when the wifi is restored.