There is a line. Putin is the closest thing we’ve had the actual Hitler in the modern era, his aspirations are similar, but he doesn’t have IBM making him efficient and his “opponent” has the early support of a superpower in the US.
Your sentiments are generally true, but there’s a limit during an open conflict like this. He’s a dictator that has his friends pushed out of Windows when they no longer serve his need. He’s also been caught leading coordinated efforts to taint the results of American elections. You don’t platform this, as an American.
Freedom has limits among adults. You’re not allowed to own a tank and drive it to the grocery store, you can’t manufacture and sell heroin as a private citizen. There are some limits we agree to.
davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 10 months ago
He should.not be platformed. either of them
kava@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Elaborate on your position. You say he should not be platformed. I think people shouldn’t use hard drugs. However, I also don’t think we should criminalize drug possession or use.
tuttobenethx@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not the previous user. Perfectly OK for Tucker to visit Putin and to interview him. Not ok for a media outlet to publish the interview. If you want a comparison, fine by me if you ruin your life with Fentanyl. Not ok if you’re selling it.
Daft_ish@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Ok, maybe drug use was a bad analogy. What I mean to say was abortion…
WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I don’t like Tucker Carlson or Putin but the idea that Tucker Carlson would be platforming Putin is stupid. He’s the leader of Russia, he is his own platform. He can make a video and every news agency will show it and report on it. He doesn’t need a platform, he just inherently has one