Comment on GrapheneOS, a privacy-focused version of Android, is adding Android Auto support

blind3rdeye@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• nixcamic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Pixel hardware is some of the easiest to get/best/cost effective with an unlocked bootloader.

  source

  • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Too bad the only affordable ones are those that have little to no support left.

    source
• Whom@midwest.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  They only support Pixel hardware because it’s currently the only line that meets their list of requirements. I’d guess that if something came around which beat the Pixel line, they’d support it…but I also don’t see anyone positioned to do that right now.

  Though it’s worth mentioning that the developers don’t emphasize degoogling all that much and their community often have a bit of tension with degooglers who come to join them. The OS certainly meets the needs of those of us getting away from Google but the developers have no problem recommending workflows that go through Google (albeit with regular app access rather than the privileged and deeply integrated access on stock Android) when they’re more secure than the alternatives. For example, they’ll regularly suggest using sandboxed Google Play over F-Droid or Aurora Store, again because of their stance of prioritizing security above all.

  It can sometimes be a bit annoying when your priorities are more about avoiding corporate surveillance than protecting yourself from attackers or a snooping government, but their work ends up supporting both regardless.

  source

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That sounds like a reasonable position. Google would have an advantage in getting timely AOSP and security updates, but getting that stuff done should be a high priority for all manufacturers anyway. As for the rest of the list, there are things I don’t know about - but at a glance it looks fair enough. So I guess there could and probably should be other phones trying to meet those conditions.

    source
  • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    For example, they’ll regularly suggest using sandboxed Google Play over F-Droid or Aurora Store

    Because many of my used apps are only available in Google Play.

    GrapheneOS gives you options that you don’t have to use. I don’t agree with you.

    source

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You know what Aurora Store is, right?

      source

      • Pechkin000@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        What is it?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Whom@midwest.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I didn’t say it was a problem. When security and privacy come into conflict, they pick security. Myself, I don’t care as much and I’m perfectly happy grabbing those apps through Aurora Store. My personal preferences don’t completely line up with them in this case, but it’s a reasonable and principled position, and they don’t stop me from doing it the way I prefer.

      source
• Tikiporch@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think because on other manufacturer android phones, like Samsung, you’d have to de-Google and also de-Samsung.

  source
• Gestrid@lemmy.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m betting it’s because Pixels have some unique hardware/ software quirks or something.

  source