Comment on 23andMe tells victims it's their fault that their data was breached | TechCrunch

• rainerloeten@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This shouldn’t be “offered” IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I’ve studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn’t to out the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.

  If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.

  source

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’ve noticed that many users in this thread are just angry that the average person doesn’t take cybersecurity seriously. Blaming the user for using a weak password. I really don’t understand how out of touch these Lemmy users are. The average person is not thinking of cybersecurity. They just want to be able to log into their account and want a password to remember. Most people out there are not techies, don’t really use a computer outside of office work, and even more people only use a smartphone. Its on the company to protect user data because the company knows its value and will suffer from a breach.

    source

    • BetaSalmon@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      How should the company be protecting user data, when - like you said -, the average person doesn’t take cybersecurity seriously, are not techies, don’t use a computer outside the office, and just want to log into their account with a password they remember?

      Are you basically just saying the company should’ve enforced 2FA? Or maybe one of those “confirm you’re logging in” emails, every time they want to log in?

      source

      • Adalast@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        From what I’m seeing, the hackers used the weak password accounts to access a larger vulnerability once they were behind the curtain. The company I work for deals with sensitive proprietary data daily and we are keenly aware that individuals should never have an opportunity to access the information if any other user. Things like single-user quarantining of data blocks are a minimum for security. Users log in and live on their own private island floating in a void. On top of that use behavior tracking to detect access patterns that attempt to exit the void and revoke credentials. That is also not even remotely mentioning that you have a single point of access entering thousands of accounts. That on it’s own should be throwing enough red flags to pull down the webserver for a few minutes to hours. There is a lot they could have done.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • psud@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yes, one of those “confirm it’s you” emails. They’re less intrusive than regular 2FA, and are only needed when a user logs in from a machine without the right cookie

        source
      • rainerloeten@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Hello, as I said, it’s about “security by design”, which means to design a system that ‘doesn’t allow for insecure things’ in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn’t operate when the door is open. IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services. There are lots more things than that of course.

        source
    • rainerloeten@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s exactly right. I was about to say how people usually don’t even “not take it seriously” but rather don’t even think or know about it. But you already said that yourself haha :D

      source

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Or, worse, they don’t even understand it. I definitely have people in my life who know about the idea of cybersecurity and are terrified of getting hacked, but constantly do things the wrong way or worry about the wrong things. Because it’s just too confusing for them.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • capital@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Fuck mandatory 2FA. Most sites just throw SMS on there and leave it at that. I’m so tired of putting yet more of my information into services that don’t require it.

    If TOTP was more prevalent (getting there) I might agree but then we’d be talking about how the typical user doesn’t know how to set that up.

    source

    • sudneo@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Companies pay SMS, TOTP is free for them (just a computation…). It is utterly dumb to implement the same logic with a paid service rather than TOTP (or security keys, at this point). So yeah, I agree with the idea, but I think nowadays most 2fa is TOTPs (sadly, some require their shitty apps to do just that - Blizzard once was one of them, maybe still is).

      source

      • capital@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        It’s a thinly veiled method to gather more info from users when SMS is the only option.

        source
• kattenluik@feddit.nl ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  2FA should be forced, it’s not a hard thing to do.

  source
• postmateDumbass@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  To badbiometric data couldnt be used…

  source