Anyone can collect the data anyway, and I’m sure at least one person out there is already harvesting our Fediverse data.
SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
Comment stolen from user “copygirl” from blahaj.zone:
Looks like they’ll be harvesting your data if you follow anyone from Threads, maybe even injecting ads. Unsure what happens to the data of people that get followed by a Threads user. A large part of the fediverse is here precisely because they want to escape corporate meddling, data-hoarding, advertising and other anti-user malpractices. There’s a number of people talking about this, here’s a recent post that highlights some of the things from their TOS.
chriscz@iusearchlinux.fyi 9 months ago
irreticent@lemmy.world 9 months ago
There’s a big difference between some random person and Meta collecting the data.
ricdeh@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Who says that Meta is not already harvesting our data? Lemmy really is about moving control out of corporate hands and decentralisation advantages, but profiling is insanely easy on the Fediverse, and it really cannot be different because of its inherent interconnectedness. It makes no sense to migrate from conventional social media to Fediverse equivalents if all one cares about is privacy.
Mamertine@lemmy.world 9 months ago
How do you know that meta hasn’t created an account on a popular well federated server and it’s using those credentials to scrape the fetiverse?
You have to assume whatever your post to the Internet is available to anyone and everyone connected. Why would federated servers be and different.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
created an account on a popular well federated server
Why would they do that?
They would create a custom instance.
Aux@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Everything is public on fedi (if we’re talking about communities alike), so any bot can and is already scrapping everything through regular HTTP. You must be extremely ignorant to think otherwise.
GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Meta can collect every scrap of Lemmy right now
misophist@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Is there any sort of legal precedent that covers a situation where:
- I am a user on a network server.
- Meta connects their server to my server so their users and I can interact.
- Am I now bound by a terms of service on Meta’s server that I have not agreed to and may have never seen or been presented with?
When I joint my instance, am I implicitly agreeing to any terms of service that exist on any instance that my instance decides to federate with?#
EtherWhack@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Someone actually asked an almost identical question on StackEx a while ago. (things may have changed since) From what I got from skimming the answer, is there is precedence, and it should be covered within the TOS of the hosting website/network (i.e. lemmy.world)
TORFdot0@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Lemmy and mastodon profiles are public so I don’t know if privacy concerns are a problem unique to federation with meta considering they could just scrape your profile if they wanted the data that bad. I’d be much more concerned about small instance admins losing funding as users migrate to instances that federate with meta until threads and the big instances are the only ones left on the fediverse
xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 9 months ago
How can they possibly steal any data other than what you publicly shared on the internet?
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
It’s not as if something was preventing them from
and
here anyway.
So that part about being followed by a Threads user is just a bit stupid.
The danger is in them becoming an integral part of the network where people don’t bother to register at a normal instance, and then Meta pulling out and the network remaining half-dead.