Comment on Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts

• hardcoreufo@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m not excusing it at all, I think it’s one of the worst vehicles ever made, too big, heavy and fast. People are for sure gonna crash these beasts.

  What I meant was I’d like to see traditional truck designs that have millions of vehicles on the road be scrutinized before the 10 cyber trucks. You’re way more likely to be hit by a regular truck which has a deadly design than a cyber truck just because of how many more are on the road.

  source

  • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “I don’t like x but it can’t be worse than y” is a construction which serves to minimize how bad something is. Instead, let’s scrutinize both: “This cyber truck is ridiculously dangerous. While we’re at it, let’s also regulate the 4 feet tall wall of grill on other trucks.”

    source

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Instead, let’s scrutinize both

      is a construction that leads to nothing getting done as a result of failing to acknowledge there are limited resources.

      The concept of “first” is absolutely key to accomplishing anything.

      source

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Criticism is not a scarce quantity to be preserved. It spreads, like a fire. Take literally any social movement, like #metoo or BLM. People don’t suppress smaller stories to “save” criticism for bigger stories. The small stories add up. Right now, the F150 is one of the best selling cars in the US. The average American is no where close to criticizing it. But everyone already makes fun of the cyber truck. We can use that.

        “Let’s not criticize this dangerous truck design because we should save our criticism!” is the worst way to get people to criticize dangerous truck design.

        source
      • steveman_ha@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        … Doesn’t “limited resources” actually just mean here ones ability to consider more than one thought at a time? Surely a species capable of collaborative efforts like space travel can handle the complexity of “no, sorry, none of the human-bulldozer designs are okay actually”?

        source