The fact that you can’t solve any real life electro-magnetism problem without them kinda put an end to that complex shaming nonsense.
Yet there are still people to miss the absolute poetry of their story.
In 1545, an Italian genius called Gerolamo Cardano was pissed he couldn’t solve square root of negative number.
« Fine! I’ll make it myself » he said, before sending everyone to hell.
He then invented an imaginary number i whose square would be -1.
It wasn’t until centuries later that another famous genius named Leonhard Euler found a practical use of those numbers.
Without those numbers we would still be living like 1800´s peons.
kogasa@programming.dev 11 months ago
For that matter, the real numbers are fake as fuck. “Ah yes, let’s just throw in uncountably many non-computable numbers.” They have played us for absolute fools.
cpw@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
The set of all rational numbers has zero size in the real numbers. And yet, they’re fucking dense, meaning you can find a rational arbitrarily close to any real number. I mean, what the fuck?
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
That’s it, I’m Amish now. We use inches and fractions of inches, and that’s as far as our numbers need to take us
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 11 months ago
No that just makes you an American Mechanical Engineer.
Gutek8134@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Their subset, irrational numbers, is somehow worse
funnystuff97@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“there are as many even/odd/prime/composite numbers as there are numbers”
g(63)? TREE(3)? BB(10^100)? Rayo’s Number? Fuck outta here with that fake bullshit
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Yeah TREE(3) is so big, how can you possibly know that there are that many evens??