Because the creator gets paid by them to provide you with a free product. If that fails to be the case you get nothing.
Comment on YouTube's plan backfires, people are installing better ad blockers
kratoz29@lemm.ee 10 months agoHuh, Sponsorblock is basically muting TV ads like in the old days.
Why should I be forced to watch a sponsor almost always totally unrelated to the content I seek to watch, and that the YouTuber decided to upload?
LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 10 months ago
AeroLemming@lemm.ee 10 months ago
It’s always some VPN making wild bullshit claims about what it can do for your privacy. I respect Tom Scott for refusing a VPN sponsorship because they wanted to make him lie.
ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Bingo. Buy a VPN for privacy just means, give us your data instead of your ISP.
Now, a VPN provider may very well be more trustworthy than your ISP! But then again, maybe not… That depends on your circumstances and risk profile.
technohacker@programming.dev 10 months ago
He did eventually take one later on, which I can imagine must’ve been a bit of a painful decision ;-;
Turun@feddit.de 10 months ago
He declined the first one, because they wanted him to lie.
He accepted the other, because they were fine with just facts.
A VPN doesn’t protect your privacy. It only helps on websites without working https, which is ridiculously rare these days. Yes, it also hides your IP address, but that is really really irrelevant. If you wanted to stay truly anonymous you’d not log in anywhere and use Tor. The only actual use case is circumventing geo blocking.
TalkingCat@lemm.ee 10 months ago
You can also circumvent geo blocking with a proxy, some of them are free, do not send any sensitive info on the free proxies however, not that a paid one is intrinsicaly safer, just like vpns.