Comment on Teen boys use AI to make fake nudes of classmates, sparking police probe

• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You don’t. Scissors and Polaroid and Playboy have been around for decades. If you wanted to see your classmates face on a nude and photocopy it, you could.

  Now it’s just easier and more believable. But it’s not any more stoppable.

  source

  • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Tbf the ease of creating multiple realistic images quickly along with the ability to rapidly share those images is a bit different than cut ‘n paste a completely unmatched head and torso.

    source

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The point is the same. Not your body just your head.

      source
  • r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It was harder for minors to get porn back then.

    source

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I grew up “back then” (when VHS was new technology) and it really wasn’t very hard to get some sort of porn.

      source

      • 13esq@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Even as a minor? I grew up way later than that and the only way we’d get porn before the internet really kicked off was to get lucky and find an old mag in a bush.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • 13esq@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yh, I don’t like that my generation was the first to be exposed to freely available and copious amounts of porn. But on the flip side the internet is sooooooo useful and I would not endorse any government saying what should or shouldn’t be on the internet, the internet should be free and censorship would be a very slippery slope.

      It’s a tough moral debate and I’m really not sure what the answer is.

      source

      • r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        In general, I’m against “censorship.” There’s also no reason why we should allow non consensual porn to be circulated. Abolishing online porn entirely would instantly solve the question of “revenge porn” and whether consent was obtained.

        There’s a certain amount of logic to the idea that you should allow bad people to feel free to express themselves so they can be identified, but I don’t think that fully holds up with porn and can lead to women being harmed. Girls who are 18-22 aren’t in a position to fully resist the temptation being offered by a lot of sex work possibilities. For every “empowered sex worker” out there who makes a good living and really wants to be in that work, there are many more who were exploited or got into it because of mental illness or trauma. Commodification of sex is ultimately a feature of the capitalist system.

        source
  • idunnololz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Then wtf is the point of saying “No OnE cOuLd HaVe BeEn ThIs CoMiNg”

    source

    • BlueEther@no.lastname.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      woosh?

      source

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        There might be a misunderstanding. I understand the original post is trying to say that it was obvious problems like this will occur with the introduction of AI generated images but it also implies an easy or obvious solution. But there isn’t one, so what is the point of pointing this out.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Clicks

      source
• saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Go back to using natural intelligence and try render with brain.

  source

  • Melt@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Brain sends data to hand and hand render it with pen and paper, what now?

    source

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      feet carry drawing to photocopier

      source
  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This reminds me of the funny picture about a black person being angry that white people can think of slurs and there’s nothing that can be done about it

    source