That’s pretty much all of open source to be fair. It’s a real problem.
Comment on Linus Torvalds releases Linux 6.6 after running out of excuses for further work
alexyeahdude@kbin.social 11 months ago
I get that Linus is a superhero, but it's still so weird to me that this vital piece of the world's infrastructure relies on one man.
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 11 months ago
massive_bereavement@kbin.social 11 months ago
It's also mind blowing to consider that as many other projects, both Linux and Python started as a hobyist project never meant to do more than cater to some personal needs.
This taught me how important is allocating time for your team for their personal projects, as the next school romance anime tagging system could be the cornerstone of every AI in the future.
Maalus@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Except 99.999% of personal projects won’t be that popular and allocating time for personal projects is a waste in that regard. Basically you’d be playing lottery and not get anything out of it.
There’s plenty of reasons to encourage personal projects, but this isn’t one of them.
massive_bereavement@kbin.social 11 months ago
I was just joking but I'm glad you took it at face value and replied.
Please have a wonderful day, and an even better weekend.
uberkalden@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Lol, downvote this guy for pointing out that it might not make sense for your company to pay for your personal projects
be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 11 months ago
Maybe because it's a wise investment to encourage knowledge workers gain additional experience working on things they enjoy even if you might not be able to pick up one of those things and directly make another revenue stream out of it.
hibsen@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I didn’t, but I get why. It’s a specious argument — it doesn’t matter if 99% of them are useless. It matters if the 1% that become ubiquitous for whatever reason provide utility that makes the useless ones worth it.
Yeah you can run a company that never provides any time or resources to tinker, but only if you’re okay with innovation never happening again.
vin@lemmynsfw.com 11 months ago
Relevant xkcd xkcd.com/2347/
It is a small bunch of people though.
TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 11 months ago
www.theregister.com/2016/…/npm_left_pad_chaos/
This legit actually happened
witx@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
That’s because it doesn’t. He is the top level manager but there are many more engineers “under” him moving the pieces into place.
PlexSheep@feddit.de 11 months ago
OSS is heavily undermaintained, always has been. But the world hasn’t exploded from it yet.
vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
If you think OSS is undermaintained, you really ought to look at the way 90% of commercial software is developed.
It’s at least equally bad if not worse, with the added bonus that no one else can step in even if they really wanted to.
PlexSheep@feddit.de 11 months ago
Wouldn’t surprise me to see unmaintained software anywhere.
frezik@midwest.social 11 months ago
The kernel will figure something out. There are already lots of companies investing their own development into it. Would just need a new leader to emerge. Perhaps a rotating group of people who are responsible for managing a single release.
Tons of smaller but important projects don’t have this luxury, though.
PlexSheep@feddit.de 11 months ago
The kernel is totally safe. I don’t see anything happening to it. Even if something were to happen to Linus (oh hell no, please live forever).
But that’s not true for the projects that don’t do headlines, everyone uses, and nobody knows. When you install software and it has like 200 MB dependencies, half of those are probably unmaintained.
Also, the term maintained is not clear. Is a project with.a single contributor and some commits this year maintained? How about tons of contributors in the past but only a release 2 years ago? And you have to differenciate the usages too, curl is dead if it does not get updated, some config parser, ls, or cat is maybe as stable as they can be.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Linux is developed by a ton of people. As soon as Linus is out of the picture (say, because he retires), someone else will take his place.
Apple didn’t disappear just because Steve Jobs was gone.
rtxn@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not really, the bus factor is greater than 1. www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL7BqWDCd8Q
CameronDev@programming.dev 11 months ago
I think its better to think of it like a president or prime minister. He might set the plan and direction and making the big decisions, but there are thousands of others supporting and making the plan actually happen.
In the past he has delegated the release to others as well.
So if the worst would happen, the linux project would continue operating fairly seamlessly.
XTL@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Is benevolent dictator still the official title?
pastermil@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Technically yes.