Comment on They use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.
Yeah, like, who are “they”?
Nazis, terrorists and/or communists. In abstract, no definition or distinction. Just don’t think about it too much.
It’s a fucking shower thought you bitches
You got 1000 upvotes. At that scale anything is a political statement. 🎉
Image
Brah, I was just happy that Wikipedia hasn’t joined the enshitification train.
I don’t know many communist per se (mostly other flavor of leftists/marxists) but most of the folks around me hold wikipedia in high regards.
I definitely do. Wikipedia is amazing.
But. Unfortunately, everything is political: reuters.com/…/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN16428960…
My point wasn’t even judging Wikipedia. I just think “us vs them” is a horrible framework for reasoning.
How is OP using that reasoning though I don’t get it. Just by using the word ‘They’?
nephs@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Nazis, terrorists and/or communists. In abstract, no definition or distinction. Just don’t think about it too much.
Daft_ish@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It’s a fucking shower thought you bitches
nephs@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You got 1000 upvotes. At that scale anything is a political statement. 🎉
Image
Daft_ish@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Brah, I was just happy that Wikipedia hasn’t joined the enshitification train.
Shapillon@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I don’t know many communist per se (mostly other flavor of leftists/marxists) but most of the folks around me hold wikipedia in high regards.
nephs@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I definitely do. Wikipedia is amazing.
But. Unfortunately, everything is political: reuters.com/…/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN16428960…
My point wasn’t even judging Wikipedia. I just think “us vs them” is a horrible framework for reasoning.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
How is OP using that reasoning though I don’t get it. Just by using the word ‘They’?