Comment on Results of the "Can you tell which images are AI generated?" survey
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Did you not check for a correlation between profession and accuracy of guesses?
Comment on Results of the "Can you tell which images are AI generated?" survey
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Did you not check for a correlation between profession and accuracy of guesses?
popcar2@programming.dev 1 year ago
I have. Disappointingly there isn’t much difference, the people working in CS have a 9.59 avg while the people that aren’t have a 9.61 avg.
There is a difference in people that have used AI gen before. People that have got a 9.70 avg, while people that haven’t have a 9.39 avg score. I’ll update the post to add this.
lol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 1 year ago
mean SD
No 9.40 2.27
Yes 9.74 2.30
Definitely no.
popcar2@programming.dev 1 year ago
I would say so, but the sample size isn’t big enough to be sure of it.
xkforce@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So no. For a result to be “statistically significant” the probability that it can be the result of noise/randomness has to be below a given threshold. Few if any things will ever be “100% sure.”
FunderPants@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Can we get the raw data set? / could you make it open? I have academic use for it.
popcar2@programming.dev 1 year ago
Sure, but keep in mind this is a casual survey. Don’t take the results too seriously. Have fun: docs.google.com/…/1MkuZG2MiGj-77PGkuCAM3Btb1_Lb4T…
FunderPants@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Of course! I’m going to find a way to integrate this dataset into a class I teach.
FunderPants@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If I can be a bother, would you mind adding a tab that details which images were AI and which were not? It would make it more usable, people could recreate the values you calculated on Sheet1 J1;K20
Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 1 year ago
I’d be curious to see the results broken down by image generator. For instance, how many of the Midjourney images were correctly flagged as AI generated? How does that compare to DALL-E? Are there any statistically significant differences between the different generators?
MooseBoys@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sampling from Lemmy is going to severely skew the respondent population towards more technical people, even if their official profession is not technical.
MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If you do another one of these, I would like to see artist vs non-artist. If anything I feel like they would have the most experience with regular art, and thus most able to spot incongruency in AI art.
brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
I don’t feel that’s true coming from more “traditional” art circles. From my anecdotal experience, most people can’t tell AI art from human art, especially digital and the kind the examples are from - meaning, hobbyist/semi-pro/pro deviant art type stuff. The examples seem obviously hand picked from both non-AI and AI-side to eliminate any differences as far as possible. And I feel both, the inability to tell the difference and the reason the dataset is what it is is because, well, they’re very similar, mainly because the whole deviant art/art station/whatever scene is a masssssive part of the dataset they use to train these Ai-models, closing the gap even further.
I’m even a bit of a stickler when it comes to using digital tools and prefer to work with pens and paints as far as possible, but I flunked out pretty bad, but then again I can’t really stand this deviant art type stuff so I’m not a 100% familiar, a lot of the human made ones look very AI.
I’d be interested in seeing the same, artist vs. non-artist survey, but honestly I feel it’s the people more familiar with specifically AI-generated art that can tell them apart the best. They literally specifically have to learn (if you’re good at it) to spot the weird little AI-specific details and oopsies to not make it look weird and in the uncanny valley.