Comment on IBM 1979 variation

• flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  How would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?

  source

  • real_squids@sopuli.xyz ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Just build a robot that understands consent, easy

    source

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.

      source

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags

        source
      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.

        source
  • b_tr3e@feddit.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    “Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.

    source

    • MoffKalast@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      "The good book saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’ - Preacherbot

      source

      • b_tr3e@feddit.org ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s the other way around human -> robot

      source

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Homosexuality then.
        Wait.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• CubitOom@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Image

  source