Normally Conversation articles link to the study in question, but this one hasn’t been published (yet). Not sure why the editor(s) didn’t just wait for that first. I agree that it’s lacking detail/context and feels a bit incendiary without it.
Comment on 40% of teenage boys believe women lie about domestic and sexual violence: new research
Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 day agoIt would have been really great if they linked a detailed breakdown of the information gathered in the article. Swear to god every article that says “we did a study” never show the fucking study. Like come on let me see the data.
Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Cypher@aussie.zone 1 day ago
I guarantee you this study gets absolutely shredded in review.
If anyone can link it to me when it’s public I will post my own review of it. Wouldn’t be the first time I get garbage retracted.
Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Like come on let me see the data.
It’s probably paywalled eh.
Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 day ago
If it is I wouldn’t be able to find out because it’s not linked to in the article .
craiglambie42@fosstodon.org 14 hours ago
@Fleur_ @Fishnoodle the study hasn't been published yet. The article said 'in our soon to be released study'