Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)
They have achieved higher productivity by not using teams themselves.
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Archer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It was obviously just a corpo stealth layoff but imagine being told as a Teams developer that Teams is not good enough for remote work
Rooster326@programming.dev 1 month ago
Zoom literally did this already
forbes.com/…/zoom-gave-up-on-remote-work---but-re…
But zoom sucks worse than Teams so I don’t blame them
Rooster326@programming.dev 1 month ago
Yes they had an all hands Teams Meeting to say that the Teams Team could no longer work on Teams using Teams remotely from home. Now they need to be part of a team by working in Teams on Teams remotely all over the world from a corporate location.
Morphit@feddit.uk 1 month ago
I read this in the Denholm Reynholm voice: youtube.com/watch?v=ejjtlnZOdgo
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You’ve got it reversed. Switching to Teams greatly hastened development, as the team’s newfound vitriol and frustration could be channeled toward the end user in a neverending feedback loop.