It always ALWAYS comes step by step!
First they will introduce age “non-real-check”, then they will enforce the check: you have accepted the principle, so what’s the big deal if we actually check it?
Because it’s not that crazy, authoritarian and is basically what most websites do to “verify” you age (which is to say nothing but asking you your age).
The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age
It always ALWAYS comes step by step!
First they will introduce age “non-real-check”, then they will enforce the check: you have accepted the principle, so what’s the big deal if we actually check it?
How do you catch a wild pig? (i dont remember the source)
It’s more than that. Go read the bill, particularly section 1798.501.b, 1798.502.a and b. Every developer of every application that can be downloaded from every package system MUST request your age bracket every time it is downloaded. And possibly every time it is launched. Basic utilities like ‘ls’ and ‘cat’, that pong example I pushed as a test, everything.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
The photo ID requirements are what will come next.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Maybe. But it will be funny for a little bit when the data starts showing the average age of a Californian is over 200 years.
swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
They’ll tag all the Linux users with “1 January 1970”
brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 weeks ago
I am ready to believe those that allowed this law to pass were.