Comment on

87Six@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• GardenGeek@europe.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Doesn’t this boil down to self-censorship in public? Better not critizise the government in public becaus you never know whos waring smart glasses…

  source

  • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I agree with the core of your point. I’d like to assert, though, that all people exert some level of self-censorship in public on the basis of the opinions of their neighbors and peers. Having to worry about powerful organizations like governments and megacorps also always being there (instead of just sometimes, or usually) adds a new degree of reason to self-censor, for sure.

    source

    • Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yes. You should have to censor yourself for neighbors and peers to have a functioning society. You should not have to do it for corporations. The line is pretty cut and dry and we should fight to keep it.

      source
• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  the biggest defense for this is to always assume you’re being recorded when in public even if you’re not

  So women in July should wear tarps?

  What posible application is there for this CreepTech?

  source
• highjayhawk@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Those who would give up any measures of Liberty to purchase any amount of temporary Security deserve neither Liberty or Security.

    source
  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I agree 100%, but a thought occurred to me…would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras. It sucks that such an existential threat to privacy could do real good. Forces some moral and ethical issues that techno feudalism is forcing on us, and we aren’t making the choice.

    you should be reading more cyberpunk / scifi literature. There is literally the case for human action and freedom within the machine. And assuming that AI cameras are also the freuquent next step in police states. Do you really want this? Are you allowed to have ambitions outside the machine?

    source

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I would love for an AI machine to be all knowing and all pervasive. It honestly sounds like it could be great.

      Except definitelt not because we know 100% that nobody could be trusted to be in charge of it.

      source
    • highjayhawk@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Ofc I don’t want this. But I look at my wife and daughter and their safety comes first hence the dilemma. And philosophy should be considered as well.

      source

      • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Fucking assholes would sell out the world for a false sense of security.

        source
  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras

    It might also help find lost puppies, but that’s not a good enough reason to give up any additional amounts of privacy to the megacorporations or to a police state.

    source

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Everyone around you has a phone with a camera. Businesses and the government have additional cameras looking all over. The phone camera being less obvious and handsfree seems like an arbitrary choice of where to draw the line

      source

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Spy glasses are much less obvious than using a phone camera.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    There is no reason for anyone to be walking around and public with hidden cameras.

    source
  • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Is unsolved assault cases currently a problem?

    source

    • axexrx@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      And I think it just means anyone deciding to commit assault just also steals/ destroys the victims phone and glasses as a default

      source