Im sorry how is making an instance vote a “weird authoritarian way of dealing with stuff”? Or is authoritarism when someone does something you dont agree with?
Magnum@infosec.pub 13 hours ago
That’s why I left. Its such a weird authoritarian way of dealing with stuff. Just ban everything and everyone you don’t agree with. Also make it a collective punishment while we’re at it…
Salamence@lemmy.zip 10 hours ago
Magnum@infosec.pub 9 hours ago
Go to their matrix channels, they’re throwing around ACAB, generalizing people and if you don’t support nuking israel, you will be banned for supporting the genocide. There is no debate, there is no discussion its a hive that moves into a certain direction and if you don’t you are an outcast. Words do still mean things and acting like you can’t govern democratically and authoritarian at the same time makes no sense.
Also acting like every community on feddit.org is a genocide supporting shithole is just crazy. The fediverse lives from its interoperability across the knots. I am a grown ass adult, I don’t need DB0 to make the moral decision for me with whom I can interact and with whom I can not. What I think is quite ironic, is the fact that even though the instance is “anarchistic”, everyone is licking the boots of the governing authority pretty good. I guess you either die a hero or live long enough to become a power tripping bastard yourself.
thirdworldistWMD@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
and if you don’t support nuking israel, you will be banned for supporting the genocide.
Based Instance waow-based
This user is suspected to have relations to Russo-Chinese state media and Marxist sympathies, please report any suspicious behavior to https://cia.gov/
muelltonne@feddit.org 9 hours ago
The issue starts beforehand. It’s easy to get an instance vote to agree with you if you ban and insult everybody on your instance who is not agreeing with you. That works exactly like those voter registration purges the Trump admin is doing.
7101334@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
It’s easy to get an instance vote to agree with you if you ban and insult everybody on your instance who is not agreeing with you. That works exactly like those voter registration purges the Trump admin is doing.
Except they are not banning “everybody on [their] instance who is not agreeing with [them]”, they are banning Zionazis and their symps.
thirdworldistWMD@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Oh nooo, not the poor dbzer0 zionist users, who lost the previous vote to 85% of the instance, thats just like the Maga
This user is suspected to have relations to Russo-Chinese state media and Marxist sympathies, please report any suspicious behavior to https://cia.gov/
muelltonne@feddit.org 7 hours ago
Thanks for linking that, that proves my point. If you have banned all “pro-zionist users” (whatever that is), it is no surprise that the next vote for banning a “pro-zionist instance” will also go succeed. Let’s have another vote in a few weeks proposing to ban all users who were against banning that “pro-zionist instance”! Democracy at work!
comfy@lemmy.ml 11 hours ago
Just ban everything and everyone you don’t agree with.
They were specific about what they didn’t agree with: Authoritarianism.
And if they don’t want to tolerate guests from an instance that allows Zionism, then good. Any feddit.org members who think their admins’ permissiveness is tolerable are complicit in the promotion of Zionism, even if they aren’t intentionally complicit. Yes, hanging around with pro-genocide people should earn punishment, such as ostracization until they stop hanging around pro-genocide people. It’s a social media account on the Fediverse, switching isn’t difficult.
We did the same thing to Wolfballs, until their admin closed the instance because it was filled with literal neo-Nazis calling the admin a ‘race-traitor’. Tolerating every belief is utopian, pointless and self-destructive.
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Basically, when you tolerate the intolerant, tolerance dies. You need social rules to maintain the order, that means some beliefs need to be culled by kicking out or silencing those who are dangerous.
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
It’s authoritarian to do direct democracy? OK then, I guess words mean nothing anymore.
Magnum@infosec.pub 12 hours ago
The vote itself is not. This is not just about this single vote.
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
What is it about then?
mrdown@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Would you allow nazism in the fediverse?
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 35 minutes ago
If we don’t allow Nazis because they are hateful and violent, why should we allow hateful and violent communists/socialists/anarchists?
Is it the hate and violence we should ban? Why is a Nazi calling to kill non-whites radically worse than a communist calling for the death of non-communists?
mrdown@lemmy.world 26 minutes ago
We shouldn’t allow people defending morally wrong stuffs that goes to all the ideological spectrum.Now answer the question would you allow supremacist and genocidal ideologies in the platforms you use?
Riverside@reddthat.com 11 hours ago
I don’t particularly love db0 as a mainly hexbear user, but this is ridiculous. They did an absolutely gorgeous move by democratically voting to defed from Zionist instances, and you call that authoritarian. Defense against fascists is not authoritarian, it’s literally the opposite.
thirdworldistWMD@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
to the saurkraut, to be against genocide is a form of authoritarism germany-cool
This user is suspected to have relations to Russo-Chinese state media and Marxist sympathies, please report any suspicious behavior to https://cia.gov/
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 10 hours ago
That’s literally the best and fairest way to deal with that kind of stuff here. No risky permissivity, no manhunts / withchunts, no putting the onus on other people. db0 as an instance is weird for a lot of thigs, but honestly, compared to the rest of the world, not on that.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
There was a vote for it though. Any user right now could open a vote to refederate.
seawoowaes@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
They really lost the plot when they joined the tankie triad.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 hours ago
How can it be a triad if there are 4 🤓
seawoowaes@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
dont send me selfies
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
I don’t wear glasses, actually.
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 40 minutes ago
It’s not weird, its’ just that this is how cowards and aspiring despots deal with things. You don’t address them, or let them be seen/heard, you silence them.