Comment on Double standards

• IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  animal cruelty laws are a good thing, but this is bullshit, why are some animals allowed to have rights, while others allowed to be butchered and eaten?

  I’m not vegan, but there should be a consistent framework.

  source

  • JenIsBringingTheDrugs@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    bird law

    source
  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    why are some animals allowed to have rights, while others allowed to be butchered and eaten?

    The line is generally a combination of social, practical, and culinary. That is, if it’s not a companion animal, it’s not endangered, it is customarily raised as livestock and it is tasty those are all evidence it probably goes in the latter category. So chicken = food, whooping crane = not food because endangered, german shepherd = not food because companion, blue ringed octopus = not food because taste bad.

    source

    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      but those are also cultural.

      horses? food in France.

      source

      • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If only different countries had their own laws and courts.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • ulterno@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      So, who’s asked whether it is “tasty” or not?
      What if someone fed a really bad diet to chicken and as a result the produce was not tasty to anyone that bought it? Can the seller now get jailed for selling non-tasty chicken? :P

      Also, I never really found chicken tasty, out of the few times I tried. Once, it was, due to the marination, but then it’s the marination ingredients that are really tasty. So I guess you are better off not referring to me when deciding what is legal :P

      source
  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Dude our whole country is governed based on the feelings of right-wing men.

    Every issue, every unsolvable problem, every “why the fuck do we do THAT?!” exists because right-wing men have huge feelings about things and the only cards they can play are either “violence” or “control” (which are usually the same thing.)

    source
  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yes the charges are related to the way he slaughter the animals. Because the neighbors were taking photos of the beautiful peacocks this guy decided to brutally kill the peacocks and eat them to spite the neighbor.

    Well that is what I read in a comment somewhere.

    source

    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      if he were to slaughter chickens that way, no one would bat an eye, bleeding them to death is the Kosher/Halal way

      source
• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  To be fair, from what I’ve seen if peacock behaviors, they’re dicks.

  Animals being dicks is not a good enough reason to kill and eat them. They should also be tasty.

  Is peacock tasty? I’ve never had any. Can we ask the guy in the news story?

  source