Gentoo is more linux than anyhing. It is literally a penguin. What does Arch have?
Comment on Gentoo Linux Begins Codeberg Migration In Moving Away From GitHub, Avoiding Copilot
baronvonj@piefed.social 20 hours ago
Gentoo is still around‽ But Arch exists and eMachines was discontinued like 10 years ago!
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Users
0x0@infosec.pub 13 hours ago
Here, you dropped your ‘I use arch, btw’
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Does Omarchy count as Arch?
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Gentoo is still a better distro, it underpins every ChromeOS device (they just do the compilation for you)
grue@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
I don’t necessarily disagree with the first sentence (fan of Gentoo; never used Arch), but the second sentence is not helping its case.
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
I don’t have to love ChromeOS to acknowledge that it’s a sold OS that’s commercially viable and that’s only possible because of the solid Gentoo base it’s built on.
grue@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Your Freudian slip is right, LOL.
Tap for spoiler
> it’s a sold OS
Anyway, sure, Gentoo is a good choice to build on, but picking an evil thing as the example doesn’t exactly endear one to your POV, emotionally speaking. Besides, SteamOS is based on Arch, so the notion that Gentoo is strictly “better” (not equal) to Arch on the basis of being used to make distros for commercial products isn’t very persuasive.
I’m not saying you’re wrong about Gentoo being good. I’m just saying the supporting argument is a weak one, and doubling down by saying that sort of thing is “only possible” with Gentoo is even weaker.
cecilkorik@piefed.ca 19 hours ago
I know this is probably sarcastic but honestly Gentoo’s great if you don’t trust binaries by default. Nothing is an absolute guarantee against compromise, but it’s an awful lot harder to compromise a source code repository or a compiler without anyone noticing (especially if you stick to stable versions) than it is to compromise a particular binary of some random software package. I trust most package maintainers, but they’re typically overworked volunteers and not all of them are going to have flawless security or be universally trustworthy.
I like building my own binaries from source code whenever possible.
bearboiblake@pawb.social 16 hours ago
Genuine question from a longtime Linux user who never tried Gentoo - doesn’t updating take forever? I used a source build of firefox for a bit and the build took forever, not to mention the kernel itself
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
The long update has the advantage of providing an opportunity to touch grass.
bearboiblake@pawb.social 15 hours ago
touch grassis literally a one-liner, cmon bromsage@programming.dev 14 hours ago
Gentoo does not have always the latest builds, not by default.
Updates depend on your amount of packages, hardware, and willingness to utilize that hardware for compiling.
I don’t use DE, just dwm+dmenu, so my biggest packages are Firefox and LibreOffice, which can take 3+ hours with dependencies. KDE or Gnome would most likely add more.
But you can put number of cores for compiling into config. If you have your PC on most of the day, you can set it to 1 or 2 and you most likely won’t even know about it.
Or, if you have 16 core CPU, let 14 do the compiling and you can browse the web with the remaining two.
This all assumes you have enough RAM as well. It’s not as bad, but you should have at least 32GB.
The distro is smooth, way more than anything I’ve ever tried, and I’m not switching from it.
cecilkorik@piefed.ca 16 hours ago
Depends on your system specs, but…. yes, generally speaking. There is a reason most people and most distros use binaries. Even Gentoo can use binaries for some stuff.
Are you going to suffer significant damage if your updates take forever though? What’s the hurry? The number of times I have literally needed the absolute latest version of something installed right now are pretty damn minimal. The major exception is widespread, exploited zero-day remote-access vulnerabilities, but those are rare, and especially rare are ones that affect the exact versions and configurations of software that I am currently using and cannot reasonably just opt to “stop” using. Even so, there are usually other ways to block the network traffic, disable the offending part of the configuration, or otherwise mitigate the risk.
Patience is a virtue, and it’s generally good for you. You don’t have to be addicted to constant updates, but you do need to be thoughtful and understand how to build defense-in-depth.
bearboiblake@pawb.social 15 hours ago
It’s not so much “I must have the latest version NOW” and more that while it was building my system load would spike from 0.1 to 7+ and everything ran like shit for like half an hour.
I’m a messy, impatient boy - I know my limitations!
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
There are a lot of binary packages now, and explicit bin versions of big ones like firefox or the kernel. Without using those an update after some months may take half a day. With them, even a weak laptop only takes a few minutes.
Gentoo doesn’t want to push you into some compiled utopia, it’s offering you the option of customizing or taking control where needed.
You can have your system use binary packages but then set one packet to source, download the source, modify it, write a patch, and have a package with a completely custom sourcecode modification that you can easily keep updating as normal at the cost of it now taking longer due to compiling from source.