I had this “shower” thought when chatting with a friend and getting an obviously LLM-generated answer to a grammar question I had (needless to say the LLM answer misunderstood the nuance of my question just as much as the friend did before). Thank you for linking the article, I will share that with my friend to explain my strong reaction (“please never ever do that again”)
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
I read recently in an article something that struck me as the heart of it and fits.
“Generative AI sabotages the proof-of-work function by introducing a category of texts that take more effort to read than they did to write. This dynamic creates an imbalance that’s common to bad etiquette: It asks other people to work harder so one person can work—or think, or care—less. My friend who tutors high-school students sends weekly progress updates to their parents; one parent replied with a 3,000-word email that included section headings, bolded his son’s name each time it appeared, and otherwise bore the hallmarks of ChatGPT. It almost certainly took seconds to generate but minutes to read.” - Dan Brooks
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
AI and someone who uses AI missed nuance? This is my surprised face. (- _ -)
fizzle@quokk.au 3 weeks ago
The most annoying part - the recipients email client probably offered to summarise with an LLM. My bot makes slop for your bot to interpret.
Its the most inefficient form of communication ever devised. Please decompress my prompt 1000x so the recipient can compress it back to my prompt.
I will say though, even a chatgpt email tells you a lot about the sender.
Yaky@slrpnk.net 3 weeks ago
The question I ask is “How do you justify saving your time at expense of others’ time?”
Haven’t heard a good answer, just mumbling “it can be set to be less verbose…”
BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Damn. Nailed it.
jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Thank you for this great answer! It’s something I intuitively felt but couldn’t put my finger on with the same surgical precision you just did.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Question: why does the linked lemmy.today “theatlantic@ibbit.at” show up here on lemmy.world (lemmy.world/c/theatlantic@ibbit.at), but there are zero posts visible in the community? I mean - since you commented from lemmy.today, we are clearly federated? I am confused - I wanted to comment on the article you linked with a question, but I can’t find it via lemmy.world :(
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Federation sometimes has a few quirks. Seems like you figures it out though
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah, it’s working now :) This was the first time I experienced having to subscribe to be able to see posts from a community. Still weird, but if I assume correctly that this works like the Usenet, if I unsubscribe again, now that the community is federated properly, the posts should remain visible to everyone @lemmy.world?
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
That’s my understanding but I’ve not played with it too much
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Let me go ask AI and copy the response below for you.
stepan@lemmy.cafe 3 weeks ago
That’s something I’ve attempted to say more than once but never formulated this well.
Every time I search for something tech-related, I have to spend a considerable amount of energy just trying to figure out whether I’m looking at a well written technical document or a crap resembling it. It’s especially hard when I’m very new to the topic.
Paradoxically, AI slop made me actually read the official documentation much more, as it’s now easier than to do this AI-checking. And also personal blogs, where it’s usually clearly visible they are someone’s beloved little digital garden.
saltesc@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Did you try ChatGPT?
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Funny how people who’s job it is to write can sometimes write gooder than us common folk.
stepan@lemmy.cafe 2 weeks ago
funny for the writer elite maybe >:(