If you made this today, but with precision ignition system and lightweight ultra high tensile wire rope, it would be catastrophic for that cow.
Comment on Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster
Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Agent641@lemmy.world 1 month ago
marcos@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You mean it would be killed more instantaneously?
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Test fired in Georgia, cow remains raining clear up in Maine.
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
i had this idea: maybe one could achieve simultaneous firing by using only one combustion chamber with pressure valves that open channels to the cannon balls
Phineaz@feddit.org 1 month ago
Thing is, the cannon ball IS the pressure valve. And since one of them will invariably go faster than the other one, the whole thing will be even less unpredictable with one half of the chain still in the barrel
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
then just make it so the canonball is NOT the pressure valve. tge way i see it is you just gotta let tge explosion build up for a bit so the pressure equalizes
qualia@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Or why not load them linearly into a single barrel. It’d shoot out straight but would likely develop asymmetries and build up a moment of inertia eventually resulting in the bolas motion they’re likely intending.
beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“It blew up and almost killed us, perfect.”
edinbruh@feddit.it 1 month ago
This looks like a success to me. Just imagine this: replace the thicket with the enemy army, you fire one shot and the rest of the army retreats.
AnIntenseMoist@lemmy.world 1 month ago
From the descriptions of the aftermath, I can see where the mangler squigs got their inspiration from.
hector@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I’m pretty sure they fired chain shot from single barreled cannon. On ships, they have two cannonballs connected with a chain and they powder the barrel and load them both in the barrel, then when they fire it the balls spread out and it takes down rigging and masts on ships.
Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
They did, but I love how unpredictable the double barrel cannon was and that the inventor thought it was a success
hector@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I never even knew about it thanks for the link will have to check it out. Seems if you didn’t fire at exactly the same time the gunner crew would get wasted, which was not uncommon back then in any case. Being a cannon gunner was not a great job. Early exploding shot was really dangerous too.
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 month ago
i would have been a great cannon gunner, as I’m not a stranger to early exploding shot meself.
hanke@feddit.nu 1 month ago
He considered the test firings a success! Can’t help but feel happy for him.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 month ago
He wrecked shit and killed a cow. Banger.