Comment on we need more users

• Butterphinger@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  …then how does this fix anything? Same federation, same downward trend of losing users?

  You’re right, on piefed, the loss of users looks prettier.

  source

  • Skavau@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The data in the OP doesn’t include Piefed instances, it only measures Lemmy.

    But no, it doesn’t solve it - I was just suggesting to try out Piefed for people expressing frustration with Lemmys design limitations.

    source
• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Piefed.social is the flagship instance, comparable to lemmy.ml.

  comparable in status, or in opinions?

  source

  • Skavau@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Status.

    Piefed.social is the flagship in the sense that it’s the instance run by the devs. They aren’t tankies.

    source
  • Quill7513@slrpnk.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    status. part of the impetus of the development of piefed was a frustration with how the lemmy devs treated people who tried to get onboarded to help with the development of lemmy. i can go into more depth about how this is a reflection of how the lemmy devs see the world, but i don’t necessarily feel like hashing all that out when i have bigger fascists to fry

    source

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Piefed seems to have its own share of issues, not using protocols which play nice with the rest of the Fediverse (Lemmy, Mastodon etc) and instead prioritizing on their own platform and seeing the fediverse as a secondary thing.

      source

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        well it seems they are not using Industry Standards

        source