Comment on we need more users
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 hours agoThanks. But that’s one instance. I think this needs a lemmyverse implementation.
Comment on we need more users
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 hours agoThanks. But that’s one instance. I think this needs a lemmyverse implementation.
Skavau@piefed.social 15 hours ago
Piefed isn’t an instance, it’s an alternative software that reads Lemmy.
Piefed.social is the flagship instance, comparable to lemmy.ml.
Lemmy.zip made their own Piefed.
Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 10 hours ago
…then how does this fix anything? Same federation, same downward trend of losing users?
You’re right, on piefed, the loss of users looks prettier.
Skavau@piefed.social 10 hours ago
The data in the OP doesn’t include Piefed instances, it only measures Lemmy.
But no, it doesn’t solve it - I was just suggesting to try out Piefed for people expressing frustration with Lemmys design limitations.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
comparable in status, or in opinions?
Skavau@piefed.social 14 hours ago
Status.
Piefed.social is the flagship in the sense that it’s the instance run by the devs. They aren’t tankies.
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 hours ago
status. part of the impetus of the development of piefed was a frustration with how the lemmy devs treated people who tried to get onboarded to help with the development of lemmy. i can go into more depth about how this is a reflection of how the lemmy devs see the world, but i don’t necessarily feel like hashing all that out when i have bigger fascists to fry
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Piefed seems to have its own share of issues, not using protocols which play nice with the rest of the Fediverse (Lemmy, Mastodon etc) and instead prioritizing on their own platform and seeing the fediverse as a secondary thing.