I mean yeah. Russia attacked a country that merely glanced at NATO with eyes that yearn, and we’re still sending Ukraine money and weapons.
Whatever the case may be, Trump’s main tactic is to spread despair; do not oblige him.
Comment on [deleted]
N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 3 days ago
NATO has already been destroyed. If Russia attacked a NATO country which then invoked article 5, do you think that the U.S. would come to their aid?
yakko@feddit.uk 3 days ago
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
Russia attacked Ukraine multiple times. There is a reason that the Russo-Ukrainian war is generally considered to have started in February 2014 (with arguments it goes back even farther).
Even in 2022, the US and NATO mostly were taking the stance of “This sucks and we’ll try to help but good luck”. We only came to support Ukraine after it was clear they could hold off the initial assaults and bleed russia dry.
At best, expect similar. if russia attacks a different country (and… considering all the incursions, cyber attacks, and outright assassinations over the decades…). “This is horrible but we must sue for peace and were you REALLY using all that extra land Finland? Come on, take one for the team”. Except that the logistics of getting our arms dealer on becomes a LOT messier if we are actually obligated, by treaty, to put boots on the ground rather than just sell guns and say “We’re not with them”.
yakko@feddit.uk 3 days ago
I still don’t think we’ve seen the upper limits of what western countries will do to support Ukraine. It’s becoming clear that what we’re up against is an attempt to re-establish the right of conquest by force as a norm. If Ukraine falls, then the Baltic states are clearly next and they know it, given the depth of defenses they’ve been preparing.
And look, I’m as sour as anyone about how Obama handled 2014. All I can say is, back then it was easier to pretend that Putin was a tolerable regional power, and not an existential threat to the international rules-based order. I don’t think anyone who actually understands Russia was tricked.
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I hope we haven’t but I am very much certain we have.
For basically any country other than the US, selling The People on “we are going to get involved in a war in a different country” is political suicide. ESPECIALLY when that war is an hour or three away by train (one of the reasons it is incredibly unlikely that the US actually invades Canada or Mexico).
Especially when putin can barely eat a sandwich without threatening nuclear war as retaliation. He won’t do it (ironically, the publicly known russian controls on nukes means putin can’t use them without getting suicided himself).
Which is WHY so many of the EU nations have hemmed and hawed over what to give Ukraine versus what to keep for themselves (with Ukraine being treated as a good excuse to refresh stockpiles).
But also… I am not confident that the EU will actually come to the aid of Finland et al if/when russia attacks them. Especially since… Finland might be the only EU country even remotely taking russia seriously.
Which is why… I strongly suspect basically everyone except maybe Denmark will be glad to point out that Greenland is technically not part of the EU…
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 days ago
I mean, that doesn’t necessarily mean nuking Russia. It could just be a defensive conventional war.
arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Yes, US military contractors have wet dreams about how much money they would make off it. Trump would follow the buisness interest.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
How much TrumpCoin did the host country buy in advance?