Taboos aren’t just intended to uphold individual moral integrity. They exist to prohibit social harm
Comment on My Religion
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“My religion prohibits it!”
THEN DON’T FUCKING DO IT.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
treesapx@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Your statement dodges the point in many ways.
sukhmel@programming.dev 1 month ago
In theory, yes
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Like what? I can understand something like cannibalism and incest resulting in some diseases, which is fair, although they’re not exclusive to religion. But most typical religious taboos are harmless and arguably more harmful to society for no good reason.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I can understand something like cannibalism and incest resulting in some diseases, which is fair, although they’re not exclusive to religion.
They don’t need to be. Religious and secular moral codes regularly inform one another.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Do you have examples? If that were true, religious taboos would be more rational.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Define “social harm”.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Harm inflicted across the general public, either to particular individual victims or as a negative externality experienced universally.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
shame we can’t prevent them from voting about it.