Taboos aren’t just intended to uphold individual moral integrity. They exist to prohibit social harm
Comment on My Religion
Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 days ago
“My religion prohibits it!”
THEN DON’T FUCKING DO IT.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 days ago
treesapx@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Your statement dodges the point in many ways.
sukhmel@programming.dev 6 days ago
In theory, yes
Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Like what? I can understand something like cannibalism and incest resulting in some diseases, which is fair, although they’re not exclusive to religion. But most typical religious taboos are harmless and arguably more harmful to society for no good reason.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I can understand something like cannibalism and incest resulting in some diseases, which is fair, although they’re not exclusive to religion.
They don’t need to be. Religious and secular moral codes regularly inform one another.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Do you have examples? If that were true, religious taboos would be more rational.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Define “social harm”.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Harm inflicted across the general public, either to particular individual victims or as a negative externality experienced universally.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 days ago
shame we can’t prevent them from voting about it.