wouldn’t it be crazy if they could, i dunno, add weapons in sequels?
Comment on One hour into Gears 5 and I feel its a lot better than 4
Linktank@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Shocked this game had any sequels at all. Came out sometime after the original halo and it had like 4 weapons. Did they add more?
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m not sure what Halo has to do with it? Also from what I remember Gears was a huge franchise back in the peak Xbox 360 days so of course it got sequels
VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I think you just noted why they compared them. Both were huge.
Kinda sad to see the state of them now.
Nelots@piefed.zip 23 hours ago
Honestly. Games that came out after late 2001 and have less than 5 weapons have no business getting sequels. That said, I feel like we’re ignoring some more important criteria here. Like the amount of main characters named John. Gears of War didn’t have any! Can you believe that??
frongt@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
It’s him, John Gears, of War
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes, there are some pretty fun weapons in the Gears sequels. I like the torque bow.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 day ago
Some would say weapons aren’t the only thing that makes a game good
rafoix@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
Super Mario Bros - 1 out of 10 “not enough weapons”
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 9 hours ago
Mass Effect 1? Trash, not enough weapons
rafoix@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
“Not enough effects. False advertising”