Comment on One hour into Gears 5 and I feel its a lot better than 4

Linktank@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Some would say weapons aren’t the only thing that makes a game good

  source

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Super Mario Bros - 1 out of 10 “not enough weapons”

    source

    • scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Mass Effect 1? Trash, not enough weapons

      source

      • rafoix@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        “Not enough effects. False advertising”

        source
• acosmichippo@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  wouldn’t it be crazy if they could, i dunno, add weapons in sequels?

  source
• B0NK3RS@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’m not sure what Halo has to do with it? Also from what I remember Gears was a huge franchise back in the peak Xbox 360 days so of course it got sequels

  source

  • VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think you just noted why they compared them. Both were huge.

    Kinda sad to see the state of them now.

    source
• Nelots@piefed.zip ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Honestly. Games that came out after late 2001 and have less than 5 weapons have no business getting sequels. That said, I feel like we’re ignoring some more important criteria here. Like the amount of main characters named John. Gears of War didn’t have any! Can you believe that??

  source

  • frongt@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    It’s him, John Gears, of War

    source
• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Yes, there are some pretty fun weapons in the Gears sequels. I like the torque bow.

  source