Wow, you stayed way cooler than I would have. Lemmy is extremely anti-LLM or AI in general.
Comment on Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 3 weeks agoYou sound drunk on kool-aid, this is a validated scientific report from yale, tell me a problem with the methodology or anything of substance.
Eheran@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
this is a validated scientific report from yale
Oof. Tell me you don’t understand science without telling me you don’t understand science.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 3 weeks ago
It is validated, yale confirmed that it is the case, it was not REPRODUCED, which is irrelevant to my claim that they created a novel hypothesis.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
🤦🤦🤦 No…it really isn’t:
Not only is there no validation, they have only begun even looking at it.
Again: LLMs can’t make novel ideas. This is PR, and because you’re unfamiliar with how any of it works, you assume MAGIC.
Like every other bullshit PR release of it’s kind, this is simply a model being fed a ton of data and running through thousands of millions of iterative segments testing outcomes of various combinations of things that would take humans years to do. It’s not that it is intelligent or making “discoveries”, it’s just moving really fast.
You feed it 10^2^ combinations of amino acids, and it’s eventually going to find new chains needed for protein folding. The thing you’re missing there is:
It’s a tool for moving fast though data, a.k.a. A REALLY FAST SORTING MECHANISM
Nothing at any stage if developed, I outted, or validated by any models, because…they can’t do that.
BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Wow, if you really do know something about this subject, you’re being a real asshole about it 🙄
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 3 weeks ago
He knows the basics, it’s just that they don’t lead to any of the conclusions he’s claiming they do. He also boldly assumes that everyone who disagrees with him doesn’t know anything. He’s a beast of confirmation bias.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Nah, I’m just not going to write a novel on Lemmy, ma dude.
I’m not even spouting anything that’s not readily available information anyway. This is all well known, hence everybody calling out the bubble.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 3 weeks ago
You addressed that they haven’t tested the hypothesis completely while completely overlooking the fact that an ai suggested a novel hypothesis… even if it comes out to be wrong it is still undeniably a novel hypothesis. This is what was validated by yale…
markon@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I was almost with you on the whole expert act until the part where you said we feed the model “10^2 combinations of amino acids.” You realize 10^2 is literally just 100, right? You are writing paragraphs acting like the smartest guy in the room, but you think protein folding gets solved by checking a list shorter than a grocery receipt. That is honestly hilarious. It kind of explains your whole point though. No wonder you think it is just a “simple sorting mechanism” if you think the dataset is that small. You might want to check the math before the next lecture because being off by about 300 zeros makes the arrogance look a bit silly.