Comment on Striking actor Stephen Fry says his voice was stolen from the Harry Potter audiobooks and replicated by AI

• Hubi@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  How is this different from a human doing an impersonation?

  source

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Because it can be done fast, reliably and at scale.

    source

    • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Our entire society would collapse if we couldn’t do things fast, reliably, and at scale.

      source

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yes, but if “things” is replaced by scamming artists, that’s a shitty soxiety

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I don't think it's a particularly mentally challenging concept to understand that we're not upset about the general concept of doing things at scale, and that it depends on what the thing in question is.

        For instance, you'd probably not be terribly upset about me randomly approaching you on the street once - mildly annoyed at most. You'd probably be much more upset if I followed you around 24/7 every time you entered a public space and kept badgering you.

        source
      • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yes, but this is a new tool with new implications.

        source
    • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This, and it’s not a human. All these analogies trying to liken a learning algorithm to a learning human are not correct. An LLM is not a human.

      source
  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You know what the difference is, trying to act otherwise is just being obtuse.

    source
  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Can you seriously not answer that question yourself?

    source

    • tillimarleen@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      well, you seem to have trouble doing it

      source
  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You could say it’s not, which means in US law at least, it’s settled and they could be sued.

    source
  • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    There was a difference between complete duplication and impersonation for the purposes of satire.

    source
  • Fordiman@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Largely? The lack of convincing emotional range.

    source
  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Can’t fake timbre.

    source
• FaceDeer@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It's emotionally charged semantics.

  source

  • idiomaddict@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s emotionally charging to hear your own voice saying things you did not. Dismissing a victim describing what happened because they’re emotional about how they were wronged doesn’t make sense to me.

    source