The paper from 1942 was meant to establish a long standing social curiosity about the topic, you goober.
Comment on Public service announcement
U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 3 days agolol i love how the abstract cites a paper from 1942
look: if you’re disgusted by genitals, i’m sorry to hear that, and i’m not judging you.
but don’t sit there and try to tell me everyone, or even “most people” feels that way.
i can’t speak for goofy looking dicks, but vulvas are extremely attractive; i dunno wtf you, or your 1942 paper referencing “study” are talking about.
again–i’m not judging. but i suggest you post to asklemmy (or literally any other forum), and ask: “are female genitalia no fun to look at/unattractive/weird/whatever tf else” and consider that maybe whatever problem you have with vaginas might not be a baked in instinctual thing that everyone has
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
you goober.
you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience. the fact that you’re trying to, and then calling me “goober” is quite enough for me to say: best of luck, tiger
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I agree with you, but you have to put forward a point that doesn’t stand atop misunderstanding a citation, or else I’ll name you another foodstuff
U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
you will never quantify an inherently subjective (qualitative) experience
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Some vulvas are pretty. Most aren’t. Some do smell weird, I imagine most will in the right wrong set of conditions. I like going down on them, but it isn’t because of their beauty.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
YOU SANT TO DROWN IN SHEMEN DINT YOU?
baines@lemmy.cafe 2 days ago
puritans
explains a ton