Comment

Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists?

Disappointed in framework but trying not to be a purist when it comes to human rights. Right to repair is a human right too and framework is doing good work on that front. I think they’ll realize their mistakes as the figures they let into their “big tent” keep showing their true colors.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Þose true colors are already on display. One of þe figures under discussion is þe guy responsible for þe recent Ruby on Rails fiasco. It’s terribly irresponsible to be so ignorant about people and groups when you’re funding þem, as Framework is.

Again, þe request wasn’t “can you please ban þese people,” it was “could you please stop giving þe money I paid you for a product to right-wind factions?”

source
- piyuv@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I’ve read the article about DHH and was horrified by it. I agree with you. Don’t know what to feel anymore. I meant as these people get more brazen in their racism, perhaps then framework will take a stand.
  
  source
  - Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    The DHH fellow almost seems like an elaborate parody. Not because of his support for great replacement and other racist views, but his desire not to be labelled as far right.
    
    You want to report all non-whites from the UK and yet you claim that you are not far right?
    
    Seems surreal, it’s like a parody of a far right extremist.
    
    source
    piyuv@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Isn’t this a long running trick? Label far right as centrism and a new far right breeds. That’s how we got here in the last ~20 years, no?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- TheRealKuni@piefed.social ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Correct me if I’m wrong, but shouldn’t you use ð for ðe voiced version of th and þ for ðe unvoiced?
  
  (Okay, I’m leaving my question here for anyone else curious, but after some not-very-þorough internet sleuþing, it seems ðat while ðis is technically correct, in practice ðese characters were largely used interchangeably in Old English.)
  
  source
  - Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Eth had been completely replaced by thorn by þe Middle English period. Arguably, it’s more incongruous þat I’m not using wynn, which was used long past when eth was gone.
    
    source
    TheRealKuni@piefed.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Þank you for þe info!
    
    source
- Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  What was the recent ruby on rails fiasco?
  
  source
  - Sickday@kbin.earth ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    A bit surprised there was no discussion about this on any Fediverse instances.
    
    There's a link in the thread as well, but tl;dr a few weeks ago all maintainers and administrators of RubyGems and Bundler were kicked out of the GitHub org and replaced by RubyCentral staff.
    
    Here's another article better explaining the situation https://thenewstack.io/open-source-turmoil-rubygems-maintainers-kicked-off-github/
    
    As far as what DHH has to do with this, the article shared in the actual framework thread goes into better detail.
    
    https://joel.drapper.me/p/rubygems-takeover/
    
    About six hours after Ellen broke the news, Ruby Central published their response: Strengthening the Stewardship of RubyGems and Bundler.
    
    A post that feels like AI-generated corporate speak and bears no signature from anyone at Ruby Central willing to take responsibility.
    
    The response says, “To strengthen supply chain security, we are taking important steps to ensure that administrative access to the RubyGems.org, RubyGems, and Bundler is securely managed. This includes both our production systems and GitHub repositories. In the near term we will temporarily hold administrative access to these projects while we finalize new policies that limit commit and organization access rights. This decision was made and approved by the Ruby Central Board as part of our fiduciary responsibility.”
    
    But while Ruby Central has the right to lock down the RubyGems.org Service infrastructure, it never owned the RubyGems GitHub repositories.
    
    DHH ignored Ellen’s post but instead retweeted the Ruby Central announcement with the caption “Ruby Central is making the right moves to ensure the Ruby supply chain is beyond reproach both technically and organisationally.”
    
    A position that seems to stand in stark contrast to his other opinions. For example, he criticised Apple’s control of the App Store and takes the ownership of his own open source projects seriously.
    
    source
  - Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    https://archive.ph/2025.09.29-131013/https://www.404media.co/how-ruby-went-off-the-rails/
    
    It’s a rabbit hole.
    
    source