Thatās true, but you still follow some propaganda. You are aware of it, great, but whatās the difference between someone following the propaganda being aware of it and someone following it blindly?
Comment on Based and Red Pilled Gigachad, many such cases š
AreaKode@lemmy.world āØ17ā© āØhoursā© agoThe key is to be constantly aware of it. Never follow someone blindly.
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world āØ12ā© āØhoursā© ago
Zink@programming.dev āØ12ā© āØhoursā© ago
Intent, mindfulness, and informed decision making?
I mean, knowing that something is technically propaganda does not make it wrong or make it taboo to repeat. The word has a negative connotation because itās typically used to describe the āotherā guys, sure, but its meaning is very broad.
If I were to say the phrase āfuck Nestleā or even just the term āDeGoogleā one could correctly label those as anti-corporate propaganda with an agenda to harm the interests of an untold number of shareholders. Heck, thanks to broadly diversified 401k investment fund options, I am probably one of them and future me could lose entire dollars.
Is anybody on Lemmy going to shake their finger at me for repeating those two pieces of targeted, agenda-driven propaganda though? I certainly donāt feel icky for saying it. I bet I could even say something negative about the president of the united states without feeling embarrassed. :]
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml āØ7ā© āØhoursā© ago
So, for example, donāt blindly accept casualty numbers for Russia directly from the Ukrainian government?