You can probably get away with it if you write it in a confusing enough fashion; but you need to make it really confusing - to the point even CPU architecture experts could miss it unless they pay very close attention; and remember that the claims - which are the only part of the patent that has any legal meaning - may be limited by law to a single sentence each, but there is no limit on how cumbersome each sentence is; additionally, semicolons are not sentence terminators; this means that this entire comment I just wrote is technically a only one sentence.
sirico@feddit.uk 2 days ago
I’m going to patent electrons passing through a xor gate
AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 day ago
ICastFist@programming.dev 1 day ago
Nah, you just need to get a friendly judge to tell whoever decides to dispute your patent that they’re wrong and your patent is totally valid and innovative
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
patent nand and nor! You’ll get much more out of it
JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 day ago
Prior art exists of that though so you wouldn’t be able to. I know you’re making a joke though lol.
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
If Nintendo can patent MOUNTS in the year of our lord 2025, that lemming can patent logic gates.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 19 hours ago
I thought this was about the ball throwing to capture monsters
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
They filed a fuck load of patents. This is one of them.
Translation: mounts that can walk and fly. Which already exist in God knows how many games.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You can get a licence from Nintendo if you like.