Is “replacing the sole” still a thing we can do with some boots? I keep replacing my boots because the sole is worn down, but the rest of the boot is still good, and I’d love to have the option of just replacing the sole. Are there companies that make boots where this is possible? Or do I need to find some local shoemaker?
Comment on Someone else will retire me when the time comes.
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 days agoEspecially given that their product doesn’t last all that long, most can’t even replace the sole because they glue instead of stitch or welt.
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
If you’re not spending more than 200 for your boots, probably not. The lowest price boot I know that is Goodyear welt (replaceable sole) is Thursday Boot Company. The big names are Redwing and Wolverine, and even some Wolverine aren’t meant to replace the sole.
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Absolutely. As long as the boots are made properly and the sole isn’t just glued on. I think a lot of Danner and Redwing boots are resolable.
I’ve got a pair of Danner’s that I really like.
couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Red wings offers this for their boots.
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 days ago
About half. If it’s glued like a sneaker it can’t be done, but a (real) stitch or welt can be done.
Some brands glue and stitch, so it looks doable but isn’t (most timberlands)
outa@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
Jim Green is another brand that makes relatively affordable, easily resoleable boots. Some of their styles have eyelet panels which are designed to be replaceable as well. I quite like mine.
WagnasT@lemmy.world 2 days ago
If you need to worry about electrical insulation just get new boots, if not shoe glue will give life for a a bit longer.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 days ago
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes ‘Boots’ theory of socio-economic unfairness.
-Terry Pratchett “Men at Arms”
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
There’s some truth here but it’s definitely not THE reason the rich are rich, not even close.
Glemek@lemmy.world 2 days ago
And it isn’t really presented as such. Its just a microcosm of how being poor is really expensive, while there are tons of ways to save money while wealthy. That doesn’t end up being the cause of wealth inequality but it does give a certain inertia to those class positions.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Unless boots were something that makes money.