Comment on The people developing vegan meat alternatives must have eaten a lot of meat beforehand so they can replicate the taste and texture.

• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Most people agree

  got any studies to support this?

  source

  • Soulcreator@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    According to the vegan society’s definition of the term veganism, which is generally considered the go to definition, human breast milk when given with consent is vegan.

    On the other hand while some attempt to debate the matter Honey is not considered vegan according to that definition.

    source

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      can you link that?

      source
    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Honey is questionably vegan because the book that establishes the basic principles of veganism specifically said its people’s choice whether to consider it as acceptable or not because of the lack of harm. If I recall correctly he said something like the debate is worth having but not worth fighting over, because everyone who is even having the debate is trying to do the right thing.

      source
  • Tujio@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Sure do.

    source

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      just saying it isn’t very convincing.

      source

      • Tujio@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        This is anecdotal. This entire conversation is anecdotal.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  TIL. I didn’t know honey could be vegan. I would have assumed all animal husbandry wasn’t vegan because of the artificial selection process at least.

  source

  • Soulcreator@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    By any strict definition of the term it’s not considered vegan, that said there are people out there who attempt to debate the matter.

    source
  • fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The argument is that bees overproduce naturally and you barely disturb them to take the combs that are done before they rot (the combs not the honey, honey basically never rots), so you are not harming them in any meaningful way.

    Bees found in nature still overproduce, so bees in “captivity” are just given free range in a field of flowers. Technically the queen bee and all the colony could fly away but they don’t because why would they.

    source

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That sounds like a rational take. I could accept it, for what that’s worth.

      I do like to ask if artificial selection is harmful. Is it possible that generations of queens/hives adapt and evolve to conform to human demands while becoming increasingly dependent on human support?

      source

      • fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I don’t think so, artificial beehives are barely a protected box with compartments queen bees are put in, but there’s plenty wild bees around there too. The reason I quoted captivity in that comment is that those bees go out as far as several kilometres to gather and polinize the flora around them. They could very much find some tree to use as a beehive and keep going out as much.

        The reason against the veganism of honey is that it’s technically not consensual, and that the smoke they are thrown to calm themselves so that the humans can take the combs is mistreatment. I mean, I guess? But that’s such a low bar that I don’t subscribe to that, you do you.

        In any case I’m not expert, you should do your research to get the most accurate info.

        source

        • -> View More Comments