Companies like Viasat with GEO sattelites have the advantage of one mololithic sattelite with massive coverage. They have a ton of little antennas on each sattelite that they can adjust as demand changes. Need more coverage in an area due to demand? They can task an antenna not doing anything over there.
Latency is a B though. Minimum 500ms each way. Which is minimum 1sec round trip just physics not actual. What’s interesting is the layperson doesn’t notice much. It’s not abnormal for a rando website to take a few seconds to load on my wifi. Or for a netflix stream to take a few seconds before it starts buffering. The biggest problem a company like viasat has is old tech in the sky. They can’t handle the load of everyone watching netflix. So, they have to data cap everyone. It’ll be interesting to see if their new sattelites later this year fix that or if they keep the caps on.
MangoCats@feddit.it 18 hours ago
Read this quick before the people selling generators get it buried: wtsp.com/…/67-144d70da-bb27-496c-8928-ab7e61a53b0…
The gas company finally figured out how to deflect their responsibility in the matter: they say that the generator owners “didn’t register” their generators, but… now that it has been a year, has the gas company done anything to improve service capacity?
Anyway: the tie-in with Starlink is, anything like this works great until everybody tries to use it all at once at high capacity. When all 53,000 residents of Grand Island Nebraska decide to stream different high definition videos all at once? A good fiber system can handle that, Starlink? I’m curious…
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Keeping the electrical grid balanced with varying loads is so hard I’m amazed it works at all.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
It’s something that’s only possible because of the scale a grid works on. It also helps to have generation like hydro, which can ramp up and down very fast.