Comment on Lemmy be like
kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 months ago“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”
burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 8 months ago
Allero@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Yet gun control works.
Same idea.
Grimy@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Bad faith comparison.
The reason we can argue for banning guns and not hammers is specifically because guns are meant to hurt people. That’s literally their only use. Hammers have a variety of uses and hurting people is definitely not the primary one.
AI is a tool, not a weapon. This is kind of melodramatic.
considerealization@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
GenAI is a bad tool that does bad things in bad ways.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 months ago
then you have little understanding of how genai works… the social impact of genai is horrific, but to argue the tool is wholly bad conveys a complete or purposeful misunderstanding of context
considerealization@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
I’m not an expert in AI systems, but here is my current thinkging:
Insofar as ‘GenAI’ is defined as
AI systems that can generate new content, including text, images, audio, and video, in response to prompts or inputs
I think this is genuinely bad tech. In my analysis, there are no good use cases for automating this kind of creative activity in the way that the current technology works. I do not mean that all machine assisted generation of content is bad, but just the current tech we are calling GenAI, which is of the nature of “stochastic parrots”.
I do not think every application of ML is trash. E.g., AI systems like AlphaFold are clearly valuable and important, and in general the application of deep learning to solve particular problems in limited domains is valuable
Also, if we first have a genuinely sapient AI, then it’s creation would be of a different kind, and I think it would not be inherently degenerative. But that is not the technology under discussion. Applications of symbolic AI to assist in exploring problem spaces, or ML to solve classification problems also seems genuinely useful.
But, indeed, all the current tech that falls under GenAI is genuinely bad, IMO.
Ifera@lemmy.world 8 months ago
GenAI is a great tool for devouring text and making practice questions, study guides and summarize, it has been used as a marvelous tool for education and research. Hell, if set properly, you can get it to give you the references and markers on your original data for where to find the answers to the questions on the study guide it made you.
It is also really good for translation and simplification of complex text. It has its uses.
But the oversimplification and massive broad specs LLMs have taken, plus lack of proper training for the users, are part of the problem Capitalism is capitalizing on. They don’t care for the consumer’s best interest, they just care for a few extra pennies, even if those are coated in the blood of the innocent. But a lot of people just foam at the mouth when they hear “Ai”.
considerealization@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Those are not valuable use cases. “Devouring text” and generating images is not something that benefits from automation. Nor is summarization of text. These do not add value to human life and they don’t improve productivity. They are a complete red herring.
Grimy@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Video games are dangerous.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
Fox News is dangerous. It turns your grandpa into a lunatic.
Hm… how do we square that one.
Tja@programming.dev 8 months ago
So is rock music! And if you inject one Marijuana you can die!
Kintarian@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Guns don’t kill people. People with guns kill people.
Ftfy
pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 months ago
as an aussie, yeah, then you should stop people from having guns
i honestly wouldn’t be surprised if the total number of gun deaths in australia since we banned guns (1996) was less than the number of gun deaths in the US THIS WEEK
Kintarian@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’ve never understood how a redneck prepper thinks he’s going to protect himself with a bunch of guns from a government that has millions of soldiers, tanks, machine guns, sidewinder misses and nuclear weapons.
MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 months ago
Secure your guns. Toddlers kill an insane number of people. snopes.com/…/toddlers-killed-americans-terrorists…
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Hey, that level of pedantry is my job
ignotum@lemmy.world 8 months ago
My skull-crushing hammer that is made to crush skulls and nothing else doesn’t crush skulls, people crush skulls
In fact, if more people had skull-crushing hammers in their homes, i’m sure that would lead to a reduction in the number of skull-crushings, the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a skull-crushing hammer, is a good guy with a skull-crushing hammerpupbiru@aussie.zone 8 months ago
you’re absolutely right!
the ban on guns in australia has been disastrous! the number of good guys with guns has dropped dramatically and … well, so has the number of bad guys … but that’s a mirage! ignore our near 0 gun deaths… that’s a statistical anomaly!
imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
We once had played this game with friends where you get a word stuck on your forehead and you have to guess what are you.
One guy got C4 (as in explosive) to guess and he failed. I remember that we had to agree with each other whether C4 is or is not a weapon. Main idea was that explosives are comparatively rarely used in actual killing opposed to other things like mining and such. Parallel idea was that is Knife a weapon?
But ultimately we agreed that C4 is not a weapon. It was invented not primarily to to kill or injure. Opposed to guns, that are only for killing or injuring.
Take guns away, people will kill with literally anything else. But give an easy access to guns, people will kill with them. Gun is not a tool, it is a weapon by design.